Legal Opinion

People v. Eagan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 25, 1995No. 95SA249PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct, C.R.C.P. 241.18, the respondent in this lawyer discipline case, Eugene R. Eagan, admitted that he neglected and made misrepresentations in two separate legal matters. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission of misconduct, and recommended that the respondent receive a public censure. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Colorado in 1958. According to the terms of the conditional…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. DohertySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. WoodrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. YatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API