People v. Doherty
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
In a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18, the respondent in this lawyer discipline case admitted that he neglected and then misrepresented the status of a client’s dissolution of marriage proceeding. The conditional admission recommended the imposition of either a private or public censure. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, and recommended that the respondent receive a public censure, We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.
I
The respondent was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- People v. EaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WoodrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. DohertySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. PooleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. YatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998