Legal Opinion

People v. Doherty

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 8, 1996No. 95SA383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18, the respondent in this lawyer discipline case admitted that he neglected and then misrepresented the status of a client’s dissolution of marriage proceeding. The conditional admission recommended the imposition of either a private or public censure. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, and recommended that the respondent receive a public censure, We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. EaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WoodrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. People v. DohertySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. People v. PooleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. People v. YatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API