People v. Todd
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
PER curiam:.
The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel executed a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18. In the conditional admission, the respondent consented to the imposition of either a private or public censure. In approving the conditional admission, an inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee recommended that the respondent be publicly censured. We accept the conditional admission and the panel’s recommendation.
I
The respondent was admitted to practice law in this state in 1983. The conditional *?admission…
2Cited by1 opinion
- People v. YatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998