First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Okfuskee County Court; T. T. Doyle, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Okemah against R. R. Baldwin. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
This appeal was filed in this court December 22, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief, nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therfore, be dismissd for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 Pac. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 Pac. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 Pac. 205.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hass v. McCampbell, City ClerkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Maddin v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- McClelland v. WitherallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Turner Hardware Co. v. John Deere Plow Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Wallingford v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Deible v. Union Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Deible v. Union Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hill v. City of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.