Legal Opinion

Wallingford v. Wood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1914No. 3474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Custer County; I. W. Lazvter, Judge. Action in replevin by Lydia L. Wallingford against C. B. Wood and the Bonebrake-Lacy Hardware Company. Judgment for the defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal was filed in this court January 2, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have the)'- offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want, of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 136 Pac. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 135 Pac. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 Pac. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 Pac. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 137 Pac. 386;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. MjeldeMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bell v. Riggs Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Thompson v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard Mercantile Co. v. Squires, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. BreckinridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. ClineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API