Legal Opinion

McClelland v. Witherall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1911No. 1211PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Cherokee County; James I. Coursey, Special Judge. Action by Daisy McClelland against R. A. Witherall. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court November 11, A. D. 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file -any brief in the case. The petition in error should therefore be dismissed, for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200, and cases there cited; Bender v. Bender et al., infra, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, infra, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hass v. McCampbell, City ClerkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Maddin v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Reliable Ins. Co. v. NewcomberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Snow v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API