Legal Opinion

Deible v. Union Iron Works

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1914No. 3478Published

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal was filed in this court January 3, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi).Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Thompson v.Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene,34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216 ; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759,127 P. 260; M., O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816,127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Reliable Ins. Co. v. NewcomberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Streeter v. HueneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API