Legal Opinion

Bender v. Bender

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1911No. 1189PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by Luella Bender, administratrix of Frank Bender, against William Bender and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court November 4, 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by.rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi). The petition in error should therefore be dismissed, for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 Pac. 205; Cox v. Rogers, infra, 119 Pac. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hass v. McCampbell, City ClerkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Maddin v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. McClelland v. WitherallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McClelland v. WitherallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. First Nat. Bank of Okemah v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Reliable Ins. Co. v. NewcomberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Snow v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API