Legal Opinion

Mutual Finance Co. v. Municipal Employees Union Local No. 1099

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1960No. 25014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKovachy, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law and fact from a judgment entered in the Court of Common Pleas.

Plaintiff, Mutual Finance Company, hereinafter referred to as “Mutual,” brought an action in replevin to recover possession of four motor vehicles in the possession of the defendant, Municipal Employees Union, Local No. 1099, hereinafter referred to as “Municipal.” Municipal filed a cross-petition seeking an order compelling Mutual to assign the title to the vehicles in question to Municipal and other equitable relief.

A restraining order was granted on the cross-petition against Mutual and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kelley Kar Co. v. FinklerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mielke v. LeebersonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Bennett v. Sinclair Refining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Associates Investment Co. v. LeboutillierOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Koslen v. Lippincott Distributing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Levin v. NielsenOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Calhoun v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Travelers Indemnity Company v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1964
  4. Mutual Finance Co. v. KozoilOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Mowery v. First National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API