Bennett v. Sinclair Refining Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
In the statement of facts Dorothy Bennett has been designated as plaintiff, Sinclair Refining-Company as Sinclair, and Doyle Varnes as Varnes and such designations will "be followed in this opinion.
The principal assignments of error may be.stated thus :
1. That the court was without jurisdiction of the persons of the defendants.
2. That plaintiff failed to allege, state or prove defendants were engaged in a joint adventure; therefore the Court of Common Pleas of Summit county was without jurisdiction to entertain the action.
3. That the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in favor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Keesecker v. G. M. McKelvey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Stark County Agricultural Society v. BrennerOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Schickling v. Post Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- Simpson v. Richmond Worsted Spinning Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
- Dippel v. JulianoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Huber v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Amerifirst Savings Bank of Xenia v. KrugOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bowman v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- L & H Leasing Co. v. DuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.