Legal Opinion

Foley v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1927No. 27,055PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action by one claiming to be a holder in due course upon two instruments which are alike and which read as follows:

“$2500.00. Little River, Kansas, March 31, 1920.
“Six months after date I promise to pay myself $2500.00 Twenty-five Hundred Dollars, for value received, with interest at 6% per annum.

50c canceled revenue stamps. John Hardy.

“Indorsed: John Hardy.”

The defense was that the instruments were executed by fraud and were without consideration. The case was tried to the court upon an agreed statement of facts to the effect,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. King Cattle Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Wettlaufer v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Dollar v. International Banking Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Gilley v. HarrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Universal Premium Acceptance Corporation v. The York Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Howell v. AblahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Hayter v. DinsmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. First National Bank of Fredonia v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API