Legal Opinion

Howell v. Ablah

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 13, 1961No. 42,212PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, C. J.:

Galen E. Howell and Elizabeth L. Turner as plaintiffs brought this action, based upon a promissory note and the endorsement thereon, against the defendant F. J. Ablah. Following a jury trial judgment was rendered for plaintiffs in accord with the verdict, hence this appeal.

The pleadings are not in question and all that need be said regarding them is that they join issues on all questions respecting the defendant’s liability as surety and guarantor of the note in question under and by virtue of his endorsement of that instrument.

After a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HolmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Ziegelasch v. DurrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. South Bend Iron Works v. PaddockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Bomud Co. v. Yockey Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Ogilvie v. MangelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. Zwaanshoek Holding en Financiering, B.V.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kansas State Bank & Trust Co. v. DeLoreanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  3. Hays v. Underwood, AdministratorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Foundation Property Investments, LLC v. CTP, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. Alexander v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API