Legal Opinion

Hayter v. Dinsmore

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1928No. 28,013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The question presented here is whether a petition to recover from the indorser of a nonnegotiable promissory note stated a cause of action. A demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

*750The petition had attached a copy of the note in question which stated upon its face that it was for 133 shares of the Farmer’s Oil, Ice and Supply Company, of Maxwell. It was executed.by George T. Dinsmore and payable to Adamson. On the back it was indorsed, “B. E. Adamson, A. W. Smith. Without recourse.” The statute provides that—

“I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. South Bend Iron Works v. PaddockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Foley v. HardySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Foley v. HardySupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howell v. AblahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Bank of America v. ButterfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fidelity State Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Home State Bank v. MilbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API