Legal Opinion
Ehlen v. Burrows
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1942No. Civ. 13122PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS (Jess E.), J. pro tem.
Plaintiff and her husband brought this action against defendant, a physician and surgeon, seeking damages' for alleged malpractice. Defendant filed both a general and special demurrer, and as one of the causes of demurrer interposed the plea of the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 340, subd. 3). The trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend, and from the judgment subsequently entered plaintiffs appeal. The minute order does not indicate the ground upon which the demurrer was sustained, but it appears from the briefs that it was based…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Valdez v. PercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Trombley v. KoltsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Petrucci v. HeidenreichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
3Cited by29 opinions
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Seitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.