Legal Opinion
Bissell Inc. v. ER Wagner Manufacturing Company
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 8, 1962No. Civ. A. 61-C-88PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
This action arises under the patent laws of the United States. Plaintiff, Bis-sell Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Bis-sell”), is a Michigan corporation having its principal place of business at Grand Eapids, Michigan. It is the owner by assignment of Patent No. 2,975,462 (hereinafter referred to as Patent ’462) and Patent No. 2,976,559 (hereinafter referred to as Patent ’559). Defendants, E. E. Wagner Manufacturing Company and Wagner Products Corporation, are Wisconsin corporations having their principal place of business at Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Defendant, Glamur…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Courtaulds Fibers, Inc. v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Warner and Swasey Company v. HeldDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1966
- Canaan Products, Inc. v. Edward Don & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
- RPTZ-Patco, Inc. v. Pacific Inland Navigation CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1966
- THOMSON MACHINERY COMPANY v. LaRoseDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969