Legal Opinion

Application of Wallace A. Shelby, Jr

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 16, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant has appealed from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office, affirming the primary examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 4, 6 and 8 of the appellant’s patent application 1 entitled “Cellular Floor Construction”, as “unpatentable over” certain prior art. In his brief appellant has waived appeal with respect to appealed claims 4, 6 and 8. Therefore, only claim 1 remains to be considered in this appeal.

At the outset, some confusion in connection with this appeal can be avoided if we first determine the exact nature of the rejection upon which we are here…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Application of OsplackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  3. In re HummerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Application of Benjamin Gruskin, Deceased, by Irma Kelly GruskinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RomeoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Application of Rudolf Brinkmann to BroxtenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API