Legal Opinion

In Re Pressure Sensitive Labelstock Antitrust Litigation

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 15, 2005No. MDL 1556PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

VANASKIE, Chief Judge.

In the wake of an announcement by the United States Department of Justice that it was pursuing an action to enjoin a merger in the self-adhesive labelstock industry and was undertaking a grand jury investigation into the competitive practices in that industry, Plaintiffs, seeking to represent a nationwide class of self-adhesive labelstock purchasers, brought this action asserting a conspiracy among self-adhesive labelstock producers to fix prices in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The named Defendants are Avery Dennison Corporation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. Pennsylvania ex rel. Zimmerman v. Pepsico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In Re Pressure Sensitive Labelstock Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Twombly v. Bell Atlantic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. In Re Pennsylvania Title Insurance Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API