Legal Opinion
Crowley v. Savings Union Bk. Etc. Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 1916No. Civ. No. 1476PublishedCited by 13 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. J. Trabueco, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiff, the surviving widow of Timothy J. Crowley, deceased, commenced this action to recover the balance of a bank account alleged to have been deposited with defendant bank by Mr. and Mrs. Crowley in the name of T. J. Crowley or Katherine Crowley, wife, payable to the survivor of them. The amended complaint alleges:
“(2) That prior to and on the 21st day of January, 1913, plaintiff, Katherine S. Crowley and Timothy Jay Crowley, were the joint owners with right of survivorship of and in a certain deposit of money amounting to the sum of fourteen thousand thirty-four ($14,034.92) dollars…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Fanning v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Kennedy v. McMurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Paterson v. ComastriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Estate of McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Minnich v. MinnichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.