Legal Opinion
Oakstone v. Postmaster General
District Court, D. Maine
Decided August 18, 2004No. CV-03-164-B-WPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT POSTMASTER GENERAL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
Claiming sex discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation, Randall Oak-stone has filed a civil rights action under Title VII against the Postmaster. General. Mr. Oakstone claims the Postal Service, uncritically accepting demonstrably false allegations of physical abuse, has taken sides in favor of a female non-supervisory co-employee against him by reassigning, harassing, and demoting him. This Court denies the Postal Service’s Motion for Summary Judgment. There are factual questions as to…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Perez-Cordero v. Wal-Mart Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Velázquez-Pérez v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Harding v. Cianbro Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2007
- Oakstone v. Postmaster GeneralDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Rosemond v. Stop and Shop Supermarket Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.