Legal Opinion
Oakstone v. Postmaster General
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 14, 2005No. CV-03-164-B-WPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
Randall Oakstone brought suit against the Postmaster General under Title VII for sex discrimination, harassment and retaliation, claiming the Postal Service took adverse employment actions against him in response to a female co-employee’s false complaint of physical abuse. On December 29, 2003, the Postal Service filed a motion to dismiss and in the alternative, a motion for summary judgment. The Court denied the motion on August 18, 2004. Hoping for better luck the second time around, the Postal Service filed a second…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BAILEY v. DEJOYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
- Lozada v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2023
- Lozada v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2022