Legal Opinion

Rupinski v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1925No. 4142PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK,. Circuit Judge.

Defendant was indicted under the Volstead Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 192.3, § 10138% et seq.) on five counts; the first three for sales in three different months, the fourth .for manufacturing, and the fifth for ’ .possession. The record recites that, the cause being for trial, on motion of the district attorney, count 2 was dismissed. It further recites that the jury “found the defendant guilty as charged.” The court, in charging the jury, said that .count 3 had been dismissed. The sentence passed was six months under count 1, an additional six months under count 2,. an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  5. Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony F. DaddinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Federico v. Order of Saint Benedict in Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Wilson v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  4. Downey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  5. Pueblo v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API