Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony F. Daddino

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 16, 1993No. 92-4119PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to this Court’s remand, the district court resentenced Anthony F. Daddino (“Daddino”). Nearly two months after the resentencing, the government moved that the district court amend its written sentencing, order to provide that Daddino pay the costs of his incarceration and ' supervision. Through counsel, Daddino objected. The district court responded favorably to the government’s motion, treating Daddino’s objecr tion as a motion for reconsideration and entering an order amending the written sentence to include payment of those costs. In this appeal, Daddino argues that the district…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Hubert R. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Frank John Schweihs, United States of America v. Anthony F. DaddinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. David T. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. United States v. Frank J. Bonanno and Lawrence J. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. William EskridgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Joseph F. Agostino, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 1996

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API