Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Bell

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1943No. 9422PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

The record in this habeas corpus proceeding reveals an unusually complicated case history.

On May 23, 1939, two indictments against appellant, Herbert Wilson, were returned in the Eastern District of Tennessee; one charging him with violation of the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 397 et seq., and the other, in three counts, with bank robbery and conspiracy to rob a bank, against the peace and dignity of the United States.

Appellant pleaded guilty to both indictments and, in his presence, was sentenced by judicial oral pronouncement to penal servitude of 7% years on each…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Sean Earley v. Timothy MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. David T. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Kenneth James LundienCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Robert Eugene Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API