Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Churchill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1948No. 30518PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

A pickup truck, owned by Ray Swayne and operated by plaintiff wife, collided with an automobile owned by defendant and operated by Ted Zorn, a minor. Plaintiff husband, as a result of that accident, sustained personal injuries. He instituted an action to recover against defendant, alleging that the personal injuries were sustained as a result of the negligent driving by Ted Zorn, agent of defendant, of an automobile owned by defendant, and operated by Zorn, in furtherance of the family purpose for which defendant kept and maintained the automobile. By answer and cross-complaint, defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Haley v. BradyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Forman v. ShieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Davis v. BrowneWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Bredemeyer v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Gulla v. StrausOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hardwick Ex Rel. Bartz v. BublitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Hulse v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Reynolds v. DonohoWashington Supreme Court · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API