Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Husted

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1942No. 5945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

J. L. Eaton, trustee, Herbert Eaton and others, children and widow of Geo. W. Eaton, Jr.; Rubye Somerford and others, the heirs of Exa Woodall; and Vera Sar-tin and others, the heirs of Ida Sartin, were named defendants in this suit by Lee Dell Husted, joined by her husband, wherein Lee Dell sought to -impress a trust, not in writing, in her favor upon 13 tracts of land now held by the Geo. W. Eaton, Jr., heirs. The Woodall and Sartin heirs, in their cross action against the Geo. W. Eaton, Jr., heirs, adopted Lee Dell’s allegations and sought to impress a trust in their…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. York v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Carl v. SettegastTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eaton v. HustedTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Manning v. BenhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Slay v. Mary Couts Burnett TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. McCallum v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API