Legal Opinion
Carl v. Settegast
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided January 22, 1922No. 220—3350PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCLENDON, P. j.
The purpose of this suit was to ingraft a secret parol trust upon a deed absolute in terms, by which on May 18,1882, Adelina Carl (who was then Adelina Binz) conveyed to her father Jacob Binz her interest in certain real estate therein specified, and all her interest in the community estate of her father and her mother, Anna Binz. The suit was brought by Adelina Carl, joined by her husband, E. Carl, against Mrs. Melina Settegast and husband, J. J. Settegast, and Arthur J. Binz. Mrs. Settegast and Arthur J. Binz were children of Jacob Binz by a subsequent marriage and devisees…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Mitchell v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- McCampbell v. DurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Rutherford v. CarrTexas Supreme Court · 1905
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Ellis County State Bank v. KeeverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Sanders v. HarderTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Sullivan v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Slaughter v. QuallsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.