York v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Travis. Tried below before Hon. W. M. Key.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Chiee Justice.—
This action was brought by the State of Texas against F. B. York, a resident citizens of the State of Missouri, to recover the sum due to the State under a lease contract made between the parties. No service of citation Avas made on appellant within this State, hut notice was served upon him in the State of Missouri in accordance with articles 1230, 1231, 1232, 1233, Revised Statutes.
Appellant by proper pleading and in proper time denied the jurisdic*654tion of the court over him personally, questioning the sufficiency of the notice served in the State of Missouri to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hopkins v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- De Witt v. Monroe & BrotherTexas Supreme Court · 1857
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Kawasaki Steel Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- State v. Standard Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.