Legal Opinion
Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1997No. 96-1221PublishedCited by 604 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Marcus A. McIntosh, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 1 He challenges the decision of the United States Parole Commission (USPC) revoking his parole. He also seeks to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We grant the petition to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and we affirm. 2
Application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to 28 U.S.C. § 224.1 Habeas Corpus
Petitioner seeks to prosecute his appeal of the denial of his § 2241 petition in forma pauperis.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bradshaw v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- James M. Debardeleben v. J.M. Quinlan, R.L. Matthews, N.W. Smith, R.G. Simpson, E. Cave, and W.A. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by604 opinions
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Montez v. McKinnaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Carlos Pelaez-Edison Carmona v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- David Newlin v. David W. Helman, Jesse E. Robinson v. B. Smith, James C. Griffin v. William R. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
599 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.