Legal Opinion
Pachtinger v. Grondolsky
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 28, 2009No. 09-2543PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Solomon Pachtinger appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, which denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Because the appeal presents no substantial question, we will summarily affirm the District Court’s judgment. See Thud Cir. LAR 27.4; I.O.P. 10.6.
I
Pachtinger filed his § 2241 petition to challenge a finding that he violated prison rules, and to challenge the resulting loss of *77627 days good conduct time (“GCT”). The parties are already familiar with the facts of this case. Therefore, we limit…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rauser v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Burkey v. MarberryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- CARABALLO v. KNIGHTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- HOTTON v. ORTIZDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- JOHNSON v. BRADLEYDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- JOHNSON v. N'DIAYEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- LACEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.