Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 2009No. B200505PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Plaintiff and appellant Dartheatus Lloyd (Lloyd) appeals a judgment following a grant of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, defendant and respondent County of Los Angeles (the County).

The essential issues presented are whether Lloyd’s action is barred by a failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and if not, whether a triable issue of material fact exists so as to preclude summary judgment.

In the published portion of this opinion, we hold:

Lloyd’s claim he suffered a retaliatory dismissal for whistleblower activity did not constitute a claim of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ferretti v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. Janet v. MarshallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Via v. City of FairfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Bright v. 99¢ Only StoresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Dowell v. Contra Costa CountyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API