Legal Opinion
Janet v. Marshall
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 1, 2013No. 34,006; Docket No. 31,090PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Chief Judge.
{1} This case presents us with a question of interpretation regarding the definition of “public employer” under the recently enacted Whistleblower Protection Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 10-16C-1 to -6 (2010) (WPA or the Act). Plaintiff JaNet filed a complaint against the Board of County Commissioners of Bernalillo County and several individual defendants alleging unlawful retaliation in violation of the Act. Two of the defendants, Defendants Marshall and Padilla, were employees of the Metropolitan Court of Bernalillo County (Metropolitan Court) at the relevant time.
{2} In…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Quynh Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Bennett v. City of HolyokeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Velasquez v. Regents of Northern N.M. Coll.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
- Flores v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- Flores v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- International Chiropractors Ass'n v. New Mexico Board of Chiropractic ExaminersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.