Gauger v. Hintz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Directors are selected by those interested in a corporation to manage the affairs and property of the corporation for its benefit. In corporate management the directors have a wide discretion as long as it is honestly exercised. The meeting by the officers of a corporation of reasonable requirements of business management is recognized as lawful and is to be protected when the efforts are free from corrupt agreements and when there is no action so patently harmful to the corporation as to indicate an abuse of discretion. There is no rule of law which requires a director to act as an employee…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boyd v. Mutual Fire Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Cook v. Berlin Woolen Mill Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re Taylor Orphan AsylumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Steven v. Hale-Haas Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
- Diedrich v. Miller & Meier & Associates, Architects & Planners, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Katz Corp. v. T. H. Canty & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Mulder v. MittelstadtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Jacobson v. American Tool Cos., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.