Legal Opinion
Mulder v. Mittelstadt
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 20, 1984No. 83-1635PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.
This is an appeal from a stockholder’s derivative action. The trial court held that Norbert Mit-telstadt had breached his fiduciary duty as a director of Plymouth Die-Mold, Inc. causing direct injury to the corporation. The appellants, the Mittelstadts and Plymouth-Die Mold, Inc., assert that the trial court erred in ordering certain monetary assessments against Norbert Mittelstadt as a result of this breach. We agree with the trial court’s decision and affirm.
Plymouth Die-Mold, Inc. was incorporated on June 3, 1953. Capital stock was issued to all subscribers, which included Gerard Mulder…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Prince v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Mentek v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Yuba Consolidated Gold Fields v. KilkearyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Mitchell Realty Co. v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Consumer's Co-Op of Walworth County v. OlsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Haynes Trane Service Agency, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Ardonis Greer v. Wayne J. WiedenhoeftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Richards v. Land Star Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Read v. ReadCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.