Legal Opinion

Steven v. Hale-Haas Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1946PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The principal contention of appellants is that the findings of fact are insufficient to support the conclusions of law and judgment.

This was an action by a minority stockholder on behalf of Hale-Haas and Eau Claire, seeking equitable redress for alleged wrongs to the corporations by defendants.

Hale-Haas is engaged either in publishing schoolbooks and manufacturing school supplies, or in holding stock in companies so engaged. The record does not disclose which and the matter is not of importance. Eau Claire, Michigan School Service Company, Minneapolis School & Supply Company, and Sioux Falls…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Luther v. C. J. Luther Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Boyd v. Mutual Fire Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Farmer v. St. Croix Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Brown v. GriswoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Timme v. KopmeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Kohler v. Kohler Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1962
  3. Bennett v. Breuil Petroleum Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  4. Bennett v. Breuil Petroleum Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  5. Gauger v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API