Legal Opinion
Nicoli v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 18, 1976PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.
The plaintiff, Biagio Nicoli, is the contract purchaser of approximately thirty acres of land which he intended to subdivide into nine residential lots. The acreage was located in the southeastern portion of the town of Easton, and was bounded on the east by the Easton-Trumbull town line. As there-is no road within Easton giving access to the acreage, the plaintiff planned to develop the subdivision adjacent to a proposed extension of Harvester Road, a public highway located in Trumbull which terminates at the Easton-Trumbull boundary line. The sole means of access to the proposed subdivision…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- RK Development Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.