Legal Opinion
Friedman v. United States Trunk Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 16, 1962PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff served its summons and complaint upon the defendants in Fall River, *150Massachusetts on January 10, 1962. There are three defendants. Two, United States Trunk Company (UST) and Clarke Precision Moulding Corporation (Clarke), are Massachusetts corporations. The third is an individual, Sidney S. Feinberg, who is the president of UST and the ■treasurer of Clarke. The complaint states nine claims, and brings the action in this Court. Defendants move under Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A. to dismiss the action, or, in lieu thereof, to quash the service upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Banana Distributors, Inc. v. United Fruit Company and Fruit Dispatch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Raul International Corp. v. Nu-Era Gear Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Abrams v. Bendix Home Appliances, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sunrise Toyota, Ltd. v. Toyota Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Hitt v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. American Veterinary Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Athletes Foot of Delaware, Inc. v. Ralph Libonati Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- K. J. Schwartzbaum, Inc. v. Evans, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.