Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Bendix Home Appliances, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 5, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL H. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This suit is brought against a corporate defendant for an alleged violation of the antitrust laws. The complaint alleges that it “is filed under the Act of Congress of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209 as amended, commonly known as the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, .15 note], under Sections 4, 12 and 16 of the Act of Congress of October 15, 1914, c. 323, 38 Stat. 730 and 731, 737, as amended, commonly known ■as the Clayton Act [15 U.S.C.A. §§ 15, 22, 26], and under chapter 592, Act of Congress of June 19, 1936, 49 Stat. 1526, commonly known as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson-Friberg, Inc. v. Justin R. Clary & Son, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  2. Abrams v. Bendix Home Appliances, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  3. Friedman v. United States Trunk Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  4. Alosio v. Iranian Shipping Lines, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  5. Newmark v. AbeelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API