Legal Opinion

K. J. Schwartzbaum, Inc. v. Evans, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 7, 1968No. 68 Civ. 104PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant, pursuant to Rules 4 and 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, seeking to dismiss the action on the grounds that this Court does not have jurisdiction over the person of defendant, or, in the alternative, to quash service of process.

The issue herein is primarily whether defendant, a company engaged in the merchandising and sale of furs, fur coats and related fur products, which does little if any business in this District, is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court in an anti-trust action under the provisions of § 12 of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Grappone, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1975
  3. California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Call Carl, Inc. v. BP Oil CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API