Legal Opinion

Raul International Corp. v. Nu-Era Gear Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 24, 1961PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

Defendant has moved to dismiss the action on the ground of improper venue and to quash the service of process. The complaint alleges a violation of the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U.S. C. § 13, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13, and the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-7, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7. Plaintiff alleges that it has been damaged in its business and property by reason of alleged price discrimination and an alleged conspiracy between defendant and its distributors. Plaintiff prays for an injunction and treble damages.

Defendant’s motion raises three…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. A. L. Black v. Acme Markets, Inc., First National Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Friends of Animals, Inc. v. American Veterinary Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Federal Pacific Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
  5. Manchester Modes, Inc. v. Lilli Ann CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API