Legal Opinion

Ayala v. KC Environmental Health

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 8, 2006No. CV F 02-5846 LJOPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY JUDGMENT DECISION

O’NEILL, United States Magistrate Judge.

INTRODUCTION 1

In this malicious prosecution action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”), defendants Kern County Environmental Health Services Department (“EHS”), EHS environmental specialist William O’Rullian (“Mr.O’Rullian”), and EHS environmental health technician Terry Gray (“Mr.Gray”) 2 seek summary judgment on grounds that evidence negates the claims of plaintiffs Leroy Edwards, Kenneth Edwards and Roxanne Ayala 3 (collectively “plaintiffs”) and that Mr. O’Rullian and Mr. Gray are entitled to qualified immunity. This…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. CoffeyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  2. (PC) Jones Slaise v. SilveiraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (PC) Tolliver v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (PS) Robinson v. Butte CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. Barnes v. Hanford Superior Court JudgeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API