Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Hanford Superior Court Judge

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 21, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00390Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00390-AWI-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED 13 v. COMPLAINT 14 HANFORD SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, et (ECF No. 16) al., 15 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 17 18 Antoine Deshawn Barnes (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first 20 amended complaint, filed April 15, 2020. 21 I. 22 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 23 The Court…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API