Legal Opinion
Ambrose v. Coffey
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 31, 2010No. CIV S-08-1664 LKK/GGHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring suits arising out of an investigation of them, their arrests, and their criminal prosecutions. Numerous motions are at issue here. They include two motions for reconsideration, two motions to dismiss, and one motion for judgment on the pleadings.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
On July 18, 2008, plaintiff Joseph Ambrose (“Ambrose”) filed a complaint against Gary Coffey (“Coffey”), James C. Weydert (“Weydert”), William Reynolds (“Reynolds”), Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America (“Travelers”), Zenith Insurance…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hamidi v. Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 1000District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Lim v. Child Protective Services of Tulare CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020