Legal Opinion

(PC) Tolliver v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 28, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02599Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RESHON TOLLIVER, No. 2:19-cv-02599-CKD-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As plaintiff has submitted a 21 declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his request…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API