Legal Opinion
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Feland
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 20, 2012No. 20110321PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] Cynthia Feland and Disciplinary Counsel object to a report of a hearing panel of the Disciplinary Board that concluded Feland had violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 3.8(d). The hearing panel recommended Feland be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days and ordered to pay costs of the disciplinary proceeding in the amount of $11,272.21. We conclude there is clear and convincing evidence Fe-land violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 3.8(d), and we order that she be admonished and that she pay partial costs of the disciplinary proceeding in the amount of $5,636.10.
I
[¶ 2] While employed as a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cone v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Smith v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- In Re Attorney CSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Andrew J. KlineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- City of Mandan v. Strata Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Sharon A. RiekWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Kershaw v. FinnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.