National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. State
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LEVY, Acting P. J.
Penal Code section 31910, subdivision (b)(7)(A), provides that, commencing January 1, 2010, a semiautomatic pistol is an “ ‘unsafe handgun’ ” if “it is not designed and equipped with a microscopic array of characters that identify the make, model, and serial number of the pistol, etched or otherwise imprinted in two or more places on the interior surface or internal working parts of the pistol, and that are transferred by imprinting on each cartridge case when the firearm is fired . . . .” Appellants, National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. (NSSF), and Sporting Arms…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL-CIO v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Calatayud v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Conover v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Nat. Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017