People v. Bunn
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
In 1994 and thereafter, the Legislature established and amended a special supplementary statute of limitations for certain sex crimes against minors. (Pen. Code, § 803, subd. (g) (section 803(g)).)1 Under specified circumstances, the 1994 law, as more recently refined, revives the limitations period for such offenses after the usual statute of limitations has expired, even if both the crime, and expiration of the usual limitations *5period, occurred before 1994. We found that these retroactive features did not offend either ex post facto or due process principles in People v.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Even Zohar Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Bellaire Townhouses, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Bonnell v. Medical Bd. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.