Nat. Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. State of California
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLiu, J.
*431 Civil Code section 3531 provides that "[t]he law never requires impossibilities." In this case, plaintiff National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. (NSSF) argues that this provision authorizes a court to declare another statute, Penal Code section 31910, subdivision (b)(7)(A), unenforceable when a complainant alleges, and the court finds, that complying with the statute is impossible. The Court of Appeal agreed. Because such an interpretation of section 3531 is contrary to established principles of statutory interpretation, we reverse.
I
In 1999, the Legislature enacted the Unsafe Handgun Act…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Flannery v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Mcgovern v. U.S. Bank N.A.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Banda v. Wash CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Bearing Distributors, Inc. v. David Gerregano, Commissioner of Revenue, State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
- Changsha Metro Group Co. v. XufengCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.