Conover v. Hall
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Once again we are called upon to determine the validity of a state welfare provision enacted as part of the Welfare Reform Act of 1971. 1 In this case we examine section 11451.6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, which establishes a standard $50 per month work-expense allowance for all expenses other than child care expenses, regardless of a recipient’s actual employment-related expenses. 2
Plaintiffs, recipients of aid to families with dependent children (AFDC) whose monthly work-related expenses regularly exceed $50, initiated this action on their own behalf and on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Carson Mobilehome Park Owners' Ass'n v. City of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.