Legal Opinion

Conover v. Hall

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1974No. Sac. 7972PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Once again we are called upon to determine the validity of a state welfare provision enacted as part of the Welfare Reform Act of 1971. 1 In this case we examine section 11451.6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, which establishes a standard $50 per month work-expense allowance for all expenses other than child care expenses, regardless of a recipient’s actual employment-related expenses. 2

Plaintiffs, recipients of aid to families with dependent children (AFDC) whose monthly work-related expenses regularly exceed $50, initiated this action on their own behalf and on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Carson Mobilehome Park Owners' Ass'n v. City of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API