Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Matthews

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

The appellee commenced proceedings in attachment, before a justice of the peace, against the appellants, upon a complaint in the form of a common count, with a hill of particulars filed, for work and labor done and performed.

Numerous other creditors of the appellants came in under the attachment, and filed similar complaints, with bills of particulars, for work and labor done and performed for the appellants.

Judgments were recovered upon the claims, before the justice, from which the appellants appealed to the Superi- or Court, wherein, at special term, upon trial by jury, a general verdict…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Graham v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Adams v. CosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Indianapolis & Vincennes R. R. v. McCaffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Rodenbarger v. BramblettIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Lowe v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Zearing v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Medsker v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API