Legal Opinion

Rodenbarger v. Bramblett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8189PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The error assigned is, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the appellant.

The complaint shows that the appellee became surety for Noah Rodenbarger and one Witty, upon a promissory note made by them to William P. Swain, for the price of a horse, sold and delivered to them by Swain; that Witty afterward sold his half interest in the horse to the appellant, John Rodenbarger, who, in consideration therefor, “agreed to and with said Witty to assume and pay off said note to said Swain; ” that Swain endorsed the note to George W. Jacks, who…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Davis v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Josselyn v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Davis v. CallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Durham v. BischofIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Birke v. AbbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Wolke v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Baber v. HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API